Keep the original words.
Every nonempty source line has an occurrence ID. Nothing is silently omitted, merged, or rewritten into an experimental instruction.
Source-linked laboratory notes. Visible uncertainty.
A clear handoff when you return.
Recorded Gemma examples · live browser decisions and timers
RESEARCH PREVIEW · NO EQUIPMENT CONTROLA source-supported wait. Inspect the evidence and manually confirm a ten-second demonstration.
Focused source-pair analysis preserves headings and original IDs. Unresolved targets and model abstentions require review. See the length-stratified evaluation; inspect every suggestion.
Up to 48 nonempty lines. Only synthetic or approved non-sensitive notes. Input is kept in browser/server memory.
Every source line stays in view. No invented durations. No silent missing steps.
Ask what needs attention, which note belongs where, or what the source leaves unanswered.
Current browser facts. Deterministic, no new model inference.
Gemma selects evidence; the source stays verbatim. Answers cannot start timers or change your plan. A valid citation does not prove a correct interpretation.
Every nonempty source line has an occurrence ID. Nothing is silently omitted, merged, or rewritten into an experimental instruction.
Ask Gemma to find the original evidence behind a question. Inspect its selection, uncertainty and real request before accepting an interpretation.
Only exact, rule-supported intervals get a timer option. Restrictions and ambiguous timing remain visible for human review.
A calm countdown keeps the supporting passage and next source line in view. It never means required monitoring can stop.
This is an experimental research organizer, not a validated protocol or laboratory controller. Prepared results are labeled; real inference uses local Ollama. BenchSloth has not yet demonstrated human time savings. Inspect the frozen evaluations and limitations in the project README before relying on a classification.
NEW / 24 frozen semantic questions: combined candidate15/24 exact evidence answers versus14/24 rules, but13/24 exact QA workflows versus14/24 and8 unsupported evidence selections versus7. Retrieval's top3 contains all required evidence for16/16 answerable questions. No reliable model advantage is established. Model relationships remain experimental proposals requiring review.
Separate unchanged v0.5 planner:20 cases,22 reference links,1 extra unresolved association,16/18 eligible waits,0 observed unsupported offers. Strong scoped rules tie. Independent human n=0; no measured time savings.
Explore every case, answer and failure ↗ · Optional core source ZIP ↗
Human trials completed: 0. Research preview; source interpretation still needs human review.